Sometimes when we move into leadership roles we experience a bit of selective amnesia.  We forget that when others were leading us we wanted them to listen more, help us learn and grow and be more consistent about what is most important.  Then when we get into roles of authority we talk more, have little tolerance for mistakes of others and change direction like a pinball.  Everything is urgent and priorities are something other people have to figure out.  We somehow think that authority is our new weapon and in reality, authority is often mythical and at best temporary.  All we really have is influence.

Unless we are parenting an infant or a guard in a prison, other people have choices about whether or not they follow our orders.  Sure, there are consequences if they disobey us long enough or often enough but consequences come with pretty much any set of actions.  Ultimately, people follow us because they want to, not because we say so.

I see this a lot with new leaders.  They still complain about the leaders above them in the hierarchy, but what they don’t realize is that the people on their teams are now saying the same kinds of things about them.  Here are a few things that new managers and leaders should keep in mind in order to make a much smoother transition into their new roles:

You’re the subject at dinner now

You can’t control the fact that you are the new topic of discussion at your team member’s dinner table.  They will tell anyone who will listen what kind of boss you are.  What you can control, is what they say.  Think a lot about whether you want them to say the same things you do about your boss.  If you do, then use your boss as a role model for your own actions.  If you don’t, then examine the way you lead them and make sure you don’t duplicate your boss’s behaviors.

Your only new power is that they have to pretend to listen

Your new job usually does mean that if you call a meeting or have a conference call others will at least pretend that they care about what you say.  What they do after that is completely their choice.  Sometimes this creates the illusion that communication, understanding or agreement actually happened.  Often though, there was just some stuff that got said.  And if people don’t care about or agree with what you said, you will probably be the last to know.  Ask good questions, help people think through challenges, insist on collaboration, insight and input if you really want communication to happen, instead of people putting the phone on mute and playing angry birds or just nodding and smiling.  The dinner conversation will be better too.

If you think you’re leading but no one is following, you are just taking a walk

Telling people to be honest, or that you are open minded, or that they can trust you or that mistakes help us learn only has value if your actions follow that same path.  I asked a senior leader once, how do you know your people are honest with you.  He said, “because I told them I wanted them to be honest”.  I probably don’t have to point out the irony in that but after watching him shoot more than one messenger who brought him bad news, I was pretty sure honesty wasn’t exactly running rampant in conversations with him.  As much as we would love for people to judge us by our intentions, they will decide whether or not to follow us based on our actions instead.

If you are transitioning into a leadership role, or even if you have been in one for some time, there is some wisdom in working to lead others the way we ourselves like to be led.  That doesn’t mean that we always give people what they want but it does mean that we communicate, involve and coach others the way we would want our leaders to, even when conversations aren’t comfortable or hard news needs to be delivered.  If you aspire to a management role and aren’t there yet, make sure that when you get there, you remember your own conversations about the boss at dinner.

 

You might also enjoy:

5 Things a New Manager Should Know

Are You Accountable For Your Team's Mindset?

Comments:

Comments (0)





Allowed tags: <b><i><br>Add a new comment:


It seems almost foolish, we put people in a business, tell them what to do and because we pay them to do it, we expect them to be fully engaged and committed to doing what they are told. But that rarely happens. They usually show up engaged on the first day, but often, only a few short months in, we wonder why they aren’t performing like the superstar we thought we hired. Some managers then start trying to find incentives, compensation programs, bonuses, and other “carrots” to get the team fired up and cause them to bring their A game every day. And sometimes it works... for a little while. Then we resort to new tricks in an attempt to keep the momentum from falling back to its comfortable place, somewhere near mediocrity.

I have a friend who was recently promoted to the corporate office, and in her new role she is getting her first taste of the politics and "career management" culture that can sometimes be present in that type of environment. People can appear to be constantly on stage, and to newcomers it can seem as though no one is genuine amidst what seems like non stop corporate clichés, manufactured praise and managing up. Individuals who work hard, get noticed and achieve that promotion can start second guessing their choice when they land in a world of endless meetings and overblown egos. People can be torn between being themselves and adapting to fit into the new way of working. There are five things that I think might serve you well if you find yourself making the trip to “Corporate”.

Over the years I have had the great fortune to work with many successful leaders; people who have helped their teams accomplish more and helped individuals make productive, lasting and meaningful changes in their lives. One trait that every one of those leaders had in common was the art of letting go. They were able to help people become more capable without creating dependence on the leader. The people they interacted with learned to lead themselves rather than search for leadership in others. The interesting paradox of leadership is that a great leader helps people need less leadership from others.

I stopped by a coffee shop recently and while I was waiting for my cup of coffee I couldn’t help but overhear a conversation that was happening at one of the small tables near me. One of the men there was complaining rather loudly about how someone else on his team had just gotten a promotion, even though he had been at the company much longer than the other person. He was pretty disgruntled and went on to list the reasons why he should have received the promotion. The list included, well, that he had been there longer, along with some things he didn’t like about the guy who got the job. I run into this quite a bit when I work with organizations that have never made a choice about whether they value tenure or performance more highly. It is important that you define what matters most in your business so that everyone on the team understands the guidelines and they become part of your expectations and your culture.

Very few managers show up each morning at work thinking: “Today I’m going to cause my team to disengage and demotivate them any way I can.” And yet, many managers spend a great deal of their time doing exactly that. It may not be their intention but if you observe them, talk to their teams, look at the results they cause; it is exactly what happens. So how do managers create such a huge gap between what they want to happen and what they actually cause to happen? If you watch them you will notice how some of their beliefs and actions ultimately create very different results from the ones most managers say they want.

Recently, I attended a parent teacher conference for my son, currently a second grader, and the teacher shared with me a new system they are using to evaluate the growth and performance of the kids. As I glanced over the evaluation form it struck me that things don’t change all that much from second grade to the business world when it comes to what matters most. The parameters they were evaluating for 7 year olds are much the same as the ones most organizations use to evaluate their leaders, whether they are written down or not. Take a look at the list below and think about whether your business would be better off if the leaders in it evaluated themselves on these second grade criteria.

I was working with a business leader recently who asked me the question, “why won’t my people do what I want”? The answer is relatively simple: because people do what they want. If what they want and what you want is in conflict, guess who loses every time? The challenge of leadership is to create an environment where people want to do what’s best for the team or the business. It’s an easy sentence to write, it’s a challenge to execute.

As I work with businesses one of the things I evaluate, while helping them achieve greater success, is their talent. It is rare that I don’t come across at least a few instances where there is an individual who has been performing poorly for quite some time, but whose manager has not taken any real action to try to help the individual perform better in his/her current role, or to help them find a better fit somewhere else. When I ask the question “would you hire them again tomorrow?” there is usually very little hesitation in getting the “no” out. Often we can trace poor hires back to flaws in the recruiting process that allowed them to become part of the team in the first place. We all make mistakes in hiring, it happens, but keeping three red flags in mind as we interview can greatly improve our chances of finding stars who can help us grow and thrive as a business or a team.

The hardest thing most managers ever have to do is fire an employee. In almost every instance, we are telling a decent person that they no longer have a job. Sure there are the occasions where someone deserves to lose a job because they have done something ethically wrong, but many times it is simply a poor fit with the role or the culture and we have to terminate a good person doing a bad job. The bottom line is that to grow a team or a business we need great talent and sometimes that means changing the talent we already have. Here are some things to consider as you face the prospect of making changes on your team.